Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Mark Brown's avatar

The poet was 24. At 24 he both could pen such a poem and take part in a real high level conspiracy. I compare that right now to having a 22 year old and a 19 year old lazing around the house apparently all summer. Neither of whom seem to be able to write an effective resume to wait tables. I'll give the 16 year old shuttling himself between athletic fields all day all summer a break. That might be as quixotic as killing Elizabeth I, but it is a plan being worked. The poet's conception of youth feels more modern or more like ours where life might not start until you are thirty-something and we should get a free pass. Where as surely Walsingham would have thought something like "you were old enough to make choices and now are paying for those choices like a man." There is something off with our conception of youth.

Expand full comment
Zina Gomez-Liss's avatar

I am most certainly among those readers who are moved by those one-hit-wonder poets. There are many poets who known to the poetry world as having a body of work; however, in greater layman’s culture they only really know in the for one poem (like Hayden’s “Those Winter Sundays”) if they are to be known at all. In Tichborne’s case, he hadn’t much other than this sad beauty which likely would not have been written except for the immediate circumstances that caused his death.

How ironic is it that Chidiock Tichborne’s death sentence ultimately gave him poetic immortality?

Also, did you hear A. E. Stallings do her explication of this poem in her latest Oxford lecture? She also gave some love to “tares” — a lovely rhyming word that sadly is too archaic to reasonably use on the regular.

Expand full comment
10 more comments...

No posts