Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Joseph Bottum's avatar

Matt Garland and Adam Roberts point below — absolutely rightly — to the near-physicality of these spots of times, as though they were actual locations we could visit in memory for their "renovating virtue."

I was going to launch here into the modern philosophical innovation achieved by Descartes, who really does treat the mind as though it were a landscape we could walk through and observe. (This is how his proof for the existence of God from the idea of infinity works: As we stroll through the mind we find an object that we are incapable of having created ourselves; also how the cogito works, in a complicated performative way, "each and every time we think it.")

But that's a little far afield, maybe, for talking about poetry, so I'll just mention that "Spots of Time poetry" is a topic Sally Thomas and I have been discussing, in our far-too-rare get-togethers, for a few years now. It's shown up, for example, in our discussions of Edward Thomas's "Adelstrop" [https://poemsancientandmodern.substack.com/p/todays-poem-adlestrop] and Robert Hillyer's "Early in the Morning." [https://poemsancientandmodern.substack.com/p/todays-poem-early-in-the-morning]

The power of their "renovating virtue" might be usefully be understood through the via negativa: John Henry Newman once mentioned what he called the "stained imagination," injured by some witnessed vulgarity — say, a teenager’s first encounter with violent pornography. Whatever the damage of such a memory, a Spot of Time is the reverse: a sight of reality that endures in recollection as a redemptive place we can visit to repair the mind.

Expand full comment
Power Lines's avatar

This line always stuck with me: There r in r existence spots of time. Why is that double r so powerful? And why do I pause after existence and before spot, which makes spots land harder? I think that line has been a spot of time for me.

Expand full comment
11 more comments...

No posts